"It is a fact that in any cross-country comparison, India still remains among the front-runners in economic growth," the Finance Minister said proudly, at the beginning of his speech presenting the Union budget 2012-13. Just one day before the Finance Minster presented the budget, beginning with this impressive fact, the Economic Survey for 2011-12 was released. The survey restated India’s low ranking status, as low as 134 out of 187 countries on the Human Development Index ranking.
The reason for India being ranked so low on the HDI is primarily because of India’s bad statistics on health and education. It is definitely commendable that the dropout rates in schools have come down to a large extent and enrollments have shot up.
However, when more than 47% of children are malnourished, naturally their performance at school is going to be low, creating a dearth in quality human resources in the future. A strength that is one of the primary reasons for India’s fast paced economic growth.
With food prices and health expenses shooting off the thatched roofs of millions of poor, this budget was supposed to inspire hope and provide comfort to the poor, especially children, who constitute over 40% of India’s population and are the future of this nation.
The total allocation of budget for children this year too, has not crossed the 4 percent mark. 4.76% of the total budget is the allocation for children. India may be the frontrunner in economic growth, but how long will it run from it’s responsibility towards children. 4.76% for 440 million children is unacceptable.
The 4.76% when spilt into sectors - education is 72% (includes SSA, mid day meal Scheme and other ministries) Health gets 3.8% (includes funds from Immunisation programmes, RCH etc…), and protection 0.93%.
The Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) allocation though said to be given a 58% increase from 2011-12 allocations. As against the proportion total expenditure, there has been no increase. It is 1.06% of the total budget in both 2011-2012 (RE) and 2012-2013 (BE).
The multi sectoral programme to address maternal and child malnutrition in 200 selected high burden districts is welcome. But the allocation for ICDS does not reflect a sense of urgency in bringing down the high malnutrition numbers.
The 12th Plan working group made an allocation recommendation of 36600 crores and the Centre for Budget Governance Alliance (CBGA) had estimated (on the basis of the norms and guidelines of ICDS) that Rs. 87757 crores is required in the Union Budget (’12-’13) to universalise ICDS. But the budget allocation this year is only 15850 crores.
And with plans to revamp Anganwadis and the increased honorarium for Anganwadi workers, one wonders if this minimal increase would actually curtail ‘the national shame’ of high malnourishment statistics in any way. The Mid-Day Meal scheme as against the percentage of total expenditure remains unchanged as well.
While over 47% of children being malnourished and India falling in the ‘alarming’ range of hunger in the Global hunger Index, The National Food Security Bill is still before the standing committee. And the budget has not inspired hope nor provided comfort in any form to the faces behind the shameful statistics of malnutrition and hunger. The problem of malnutrition is not in the statistics. It is in the humiliation. The budget should have implemented decisive steps to provide food security.
During the budget speech the Finance Minister quoted from Shakespeare’s Hamlet, saying “…I must be cruel only to be kind…” Though stated humorously, one wonders if we are actually being cruel to the 440 million children who absolutely do not have any voice in any of the surfeit of economic lobbying that goes behind budget allocations.
Despite having a high economic growth rate, India is still far behind many countries, including developing countries in various development indicators related to children. When the rights and priorities of over 40% of the nation, who are the future of this nation, are being ignored, can we afford to lift our collar and boast about our high economic growth rate? For whom is it growing?
